|
Scientific Name | Cyphia volubilis (Burm.f.) Willd. |
Higher Classification | Dicotyledons |
Family | LOBELIACEAE |
Synonyms | Cyphia tricuspis E.Wimm., Cyphia volubilis (Burm.f.) Willd. var. volubilis, Lobelia volubilis Burm.f. |
Common Names | Aardboontjie (a), Baroe (a), Barroe (a), Bergbaroe (a), Broes (a) |
National Status |
Status and Criteria | Least Concern |
Assessment Date | 2023/08/11 |
Assessor(s) | N.N. Mhlongo & H. Mtshali |
Justification | This species has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 106 257 km² and an area of occupancy (AOO) of 1540 km². It is widespread, common and is not in danger of extinction. It is listed as Least concern. |
Distribution |
Endemism | South African endemic |
Provincial distribution | Western Cape |
Range | It is endemic and widespread in the Western Cape Province, where it occurs from Clanwilliam to Cape Peninsula, Worcester Swellendam. |
Habitat and Ecology |
Major system | Terrestrial |
Major habitats | Fynbos |
Description | This tuberous geophyte grows in sandy flats and mountain slopes. |
Threats |
The species is facing various threats in some parts of its range. These threats include competition with invasive alien species in at least 11 subpopulations. Habitat degradation due to livestock farming and abandonment of agricultural sites was observed in three subpopulations. Some subpopulations are at risk from too frequent fires, habitat loss due to agricultural crops and wood plantations, and habitat loss due to infrastructure development for human settlement, tourism, and transportation.
Water pollution is a slight continuing threat in one subpopulation, while land pollution due to agricultural waste and commercial/industrial activities is projected to be a future threat at two sites. Habitat loss due to mining extraction is an ongoing threat at three locations, and changes in native species dynamics are a continuing threat in one subpopulation.
Despite these threats, the species is still widespread and common, suggesting that the impact of these threats is likely minimal at this time. |
Population |
It is widespread in the Western Cape, occurring in more than 50 subpopulations. It is known in herbaria from over 100 collections with a date range of 1883 to 2012. It is also known from 656 recent observation records on iNaturalist. The population is locally common and not declining.
|
Population trend | Stable |
Assessment History |
Taxon assessed |
Status and Criteria |
Citation/Red List version | Cyphia tricuspis E.Wimm. | Data Deficient (Taxonomically Problematic) | Raimondo et al. (2009) | Cyphia volubilis (Burm.f.) Willd. var. volubilis | Least Concern | Raimondo et al. (2009) | |
Bibliography |
Goldblatt, P. and Manning, J.C. 2000. Cape Plants: A conspectus of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
Govaerts, R. 1996. World Checklist of Seed Plants 1, 2:1-492, MIM, Deurne.
Manning, J.C. and Goldblatt, P. 2012. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: The Core Cape Flora. Strelitzia 29. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
|
Citation |
Mhlongo, N.N. & Mtshali, H. 2023. Cyphia volubilis (Burm.f.) Willd. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2024/12/06 |